Since the privatization of the housing stock, all responsibility for the operation, improvement and repair of housing has fallen on the shoulders of the owners. Now not only the apartment, but also the house itself is taken care of by its tenants. The Housing Code of the Russian Federation provides for several forms of managing a residential building: direct management, the creation of an HOA and the conclusion of a service agreement with the Management Company.

Despite the fact that the ability to decide how to manage the house has appeared for the tenants for a long time, the situation remains typical when the neighbors cannot agree and finally decide which way of management is best for them. Often the reason for this is a misunderstanding of what is being offered. The abbreviations sound scary, behind each of them, it seems, is another fraud to raise funds, disappearing to no one knows where. An initiative group sometimes offers a reliable way to manage, but there are those who, no matter what, want to leave everything as it is, although they don’t understand how it really is either.

Let's try to understand the pros and cons of a particular form of management.

First of all, you should dwell on the varieties of forms of home management. What is behind the abbreviation of the organization? What are the functions of housing management? What can you ask her for? It is the form of management that determines its functional responsibilities.

The most common three ways to manage an apartment building

Direct control

With this form of management, each owner of the premises, on his own behalf, concludes agreements with resource supply organizations - for water supply, electricity supply, gas supply, etc. In this case, the agreement is considered valid if it is concluded by 50% of the owners. There is no required percentage - the contract can not be executed. That is why this method of management is chosen by residents of houses where there are no more than 12 apartments. Residents must approach their obligations responsibly and unitedly. Most often, the fee for services is paid by the elected chairman of the house. And the general house interests in organizations are defended by the elder in the house. They are not legal entities and work by proxy. Direct management is considered the most economical, since there are no intermediaries. At the same time, this is the most fertile ground for all kinds of offenses. The house manager may evade reporting or provide fake documents and sales receipts, in a word, use fraud for his own gain.

Direct control of the house is one of the cheapest, but the most risky. Suitable for houses with a small number of apartments.

There are a number of disadvantages of such management. Maintenance of housing can be carried out both by the forces of the owners, and by contractors involved in the facility. But if there are more than 12 apartments in the house, the owners are required to hire a management company, with which they conclude a contract for services and work (this contract is governed by the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, and not Article 162 of the Housing Code of the Russian Federation). The legislation does not clearly define the terms of the contract for the maintenance of common property. Management organizations can draw up a contract, taking into account, first of all, their own interests, and not the residents of the house. If the agreement on the part of the owners is not thought out, then even the State Housing Inspectorate will not be able to help. In addition, with this method of management, there is no authority to check the activities of the management company, provided for by housing legislation, since it acts as a contractor performing work. The frequency and form of the report of the managing organizations are not indicated.

No less interesting is the question of the quality of public services. Responsibility for the maintenance of networks, for their serviceability lies with the contractor. Water and heat are supplied to the house by resource-supplying organizations. But if suddenly there is no water on the upper floors or radiators are poorly heated in the corner apartments, then there is no one to bear responsibility for this, such moments are not spelled out in the legislation. With direct management, it is difficult to protect the rights of tenants.

Homeowners association - homeowners association

This business community can be compared to a kind of headman who stands up for every corner of his house, scrupulously monitors the condition of the home, takes measures to eliminate malfunctions and improve the quality of housing. Recently, you can meet another abbreviation - TNS. In accordance with the amendments made to the Housing Code, from September 1, 2014, all HOAs are registered as TSN (real estate owners association). Already existing partnerships are not required to undergo re-registration, therefore, HOAs still remain in common use. Just remember that HOA and TSN are one and the same. As with any structure, HOA activities has its pros and cons.

Benefits of HOA

With HOA, homeowners are directly involved in managing the house and solving the main issues. This is a definite plus. The owners of apartments in the house know better what problems need to be solved in the first place, where, having united, to direct forces, what to spend money on. Payment for the maintenance of the house comes from the money collected from the tenants. Once a year is held general meeting tenants, where the annual budget is approved, the amounts of payments and contributions are established, decisions are made on the lease of non-residential areas of the property. Then, during the year, the chairman and the elected board solve the tasks assigned to them. The Housing Code includes a wide range of issues in the powers of members of the HOA meeting (Housing Code (Chapter 13), § 1 Ch. 4 Civil Code RF).

The HOA has the right to choose the operating organization, control its work, evaluate the quality of the services provided. In case of shortcomings, demand their elimination. In case of unsatisfactory cooperation with a particular organization, change it.

Another undoubted advantage is the right to dispose of places and premises common use. At the discretion of the HOA, on the territory adjacent to the house they can place children's play complexes, sports, as well as organize guest parking. Attics and basements are also operated according to joint decision. It is profitable to rent them out, and with the funds received, as a rule, they carry out repairs in the house, thereby reducing the contributions of tenants.

Municipalities can become another point of income. If there are non-privatized premises in the house, then the municipal structure must be engaged in their maintenance as owners. If they are not properly maintained, the HOA may forcibly collect payments.

Art. 153 of the Housing Code of the Russian Federation allows, at the initiative of the HOA, to build additional premises to the common property for the purpose of their subsequent leasing and obtaining additional income, thereby reducing the amount of contributions.

Another of the advantages of the HOA is the ability to refuse the services of the Directorate for the operation of the house. The owners of apartments through the HOA themselves decide who to hire, that is, they solve problems on their own. They conclude contracts with service personnel, with the necessary organizations on favorable terms for themselves.

Negative aspects of HOA

Of the minuses of the activities of the HOA, several points can be distinguished. The most common reason for negative attitudes towards HOAs are high utility bills. In general, they are no higher than the average for the city. Just besides utilities, HOA is obliged to pay for the work of an accountant, lawyer, governing bodies, etc. All these items are taken into account when collecting mandatory membership fees.

The second point concerns the creation of the HOA itself. The Housing Code of the Russian Federation states that the number of members of an association of homeowners must exceed 50% of the total number of votes of the owners of the premises of an apartment building. This means that the opinion of the majority of residents is taken into account. If there is a minority that is against it, their point of view is not taken into account. They will have to come to terms with this situation.

Well, one of the most important negative aspects of the HOA in the assessment of specialists remains the complexity of the form of government. Despite all the above advantages, for beginners, this form of management is backbreaking work. Many pitfalls at the initial stage of the board lead to great risks and mistakes. HOA is a team of educated, trained and united individuals. They should be able to calmly, without emotions, agree on various issues: determining the amount of payments, charges, all kinds of mandatory minimum services and works, concluding contracts. We must be prepared to make payments for those residents who detain them. As experts advise, there is no need to hurry with this form of management. At the initial stage, it is worth working in cooperation with the Management Company. By controlling their work, understand all the features of this form of management, then switch to independent management in the form of an HOA.

An apartment building is managed either with the help of a Management Company or by creating an HOA. often practice joint form board, when the HOA enters into an agreement for the provision of services with the management company.
Photo: novostroykin.ru

Management Company

Another form of management is with the help of the Management Company. Her responsibilities include paying for the maintenance and repair of housing, and making payments for utilities. With this method of control, everything is extremely clear. The owners enter into an agreement with the best, in their opinion, company. It fulfills its obligations under the contract with the help of its staff. "Under the wing" of the Criminal Code is good, but not cheap. The intermediary charges money for their services. Consequently, owners often have a desire to find out whether their funds are being spent correctly. They have every right to do so. The Management Company, in turn, must keep records and provide tenants with access to the necessary information. Often they cooperate with the Criminal Code through the HOA. Owners who do not have management experience hire professionals, that is, the management company, transfer the management of the house to her, and themselves remain as a control body in the person of the HOA. Members of the HOA have the right to approve the charter, elect the chairman, the board of the HOA, and conclude an agreement with the Management Company.

From the foregoing, the following conclusion can be drawn. Direct control of the house is one of the cheapest, but the most risky. Suitable for houses with a small number of apartments. Management with the help of a Management Company is convenient, comfortable, but requires control by the owners, which means that all the same, residents must choose a responsible group, or completely trust the U.K. When managing a house with the help of an HOA, you need a strong, competent, professional manager. This method of management suits those who are well versed in housing matters, have a responsible group and an active, reliable chairman. When it is difficult to elect such a group of “top management” from the residents of the house themselves, they practice a joint form of government, the HOA concludes a service agreement with the management company.

According to experts, in order not to reach a dead end at the initial stage of managing a house, there are several positions that must be observed.

1. The initiative group must draw up a management contract (it is necessary to ensure that it does not expire).
2. The board of the HOA is elected for 2 years (the powers should not be expired).
3. The chairman of the HOA is registered in tax office. Really present in the house. Not an employee of the UK.
4. The register of members of the HOA contains more than 50% of the owners of the premises. This means that the HOA is legitimate, legal.
5. There is a protocol on the choice of this method of control.

If these points are observed, the actual management group at home can safely work according to the HOA scheme, or enter into an agreement with the Criminal Code, which, in fulfilling its tasks, reports to the HOA. Together they participate in risks and, in fact, make their work transparent. In any case, the order in the house depends on the activity of homeowners, and on a competent approach to managing the house.

Based on the results of work in the first half of 2018, a rating of organizations managing multi-apartment housing stock in the Moscow region was compiled, the voting was held on the Dobrodel portal and took into account 13 criteria for evaluating the work of management companies by analogy with the assessment of hotels according to the star system, the press service of the Ministry of Housing and public utilities of the Moscow region.

“The rating included about a thousand managing enterprises, but only a third of them received three or more stars. The most "star" management companies (MC) serve 131 apartment house, about 1 million meters of living space (in total, in the Moscow region, the multi-apartment housing stock is about 197 million square meters). According to the rating, four-star companies service some houses located in Podolsk, Serpukhov, Ivanteevka, Domodedovo, Krasnogorsk, Ramenskoye and Shchelkovsky municipal districts.

As recalled in the press service, in the spring of this year, the Governor of the Moscow Region, Andrey Vorobyov, instructed the regional Ministry of Housing and Communal Services, in cooperation with the heads of municipalities, to create a rating of management companies (MC) that manage common property multi-apartment housing stock.

To implement this task, the Ministry of Housing and Communal Services of the Moscow Region, together with the regional Goszhilinspektsiya, Gosadmtekhnadzor and the Association of Council Chairmen apartment buildings(APSD) developed a new methodology for assessing the UK, in accordance with which in the Moscow region the classification of management companies was carried out by analogy with the assessment of hotels according to the star system, the material explains.

“In total, 928 enterprises entered the regional rating, of which eight enterprises received the highest rating - four stars, including “MUZHRP No. 12” in Podolsk, LLC “Gorodskaya Utility Company” in Serpukhov, two organizations in Ivanteevka - Pionerskaya 11 LLC and Stroyregister LLC, Zhilservis-A LLC in the Shchelkovsky district, DomExCom LLC in Domodedovo, Vesta-Service LLC in Ramenskoye municipal area, Service Dom LLC operates in Krasnogorsk and the Shchelkovsky municipal district. In addition, 346 managing enterprises received three stars, 507 - two stars, 67 "managers" have one star each.

It explains that about 20,000 residents cast their votes for the criteria. Management companies were evaluated according to such criteria as the quality of interaction with the councils of apartment buildings (MKD), the quality of maintenance of entrances and yard areas, the presence of high payment discipline in settlements with resource supply organizations, the organization of the work of dispatch services to the population through the unified dispatch services (EDS) of municipalities, the implementation repair of entrances, uninterrupted supply of utilities, including heat supply, hot and cold water supply, electricity supply to residents. In total, 13 criteria for assessing the UK were taken into account in the rating calculation. The data that significantly influenced the rating calculation was collected and processed through an extensive network of chairmen of the Association of Chairmen of Councils of Apartment Buildings.

“The rating turned out to be really popular, since the residents themselves chose the list of all evaluation criteria by online voting on the Dobrodel portal, which was held this spring,” said Yevgeny Khromushin, Minister of Housing and Public Utilities of the Moscow Region.

According to him, everyone could choose or propose their own criteria for evaluating management companies, which made it relevant and absolutely transparent, enabling apartment owners to form a correct understanding of what constitutes the UK rating. Based on this rating, the administration municipality can initiate the process of re-election of management companies that perform their work in bad faith and, based on the results of the rating, received low score, and apartment owners will be able to be guided by the presence of stars when deciding at a meeting on the extension of the services of the previous one or the choice of a new management company.

“The new rating of managing organizations will now be clear to residents. Its criteria are exactly what is important for residents: high-quality uninterrupted resources, so that the houses are warm, light, clean, openness of the managing organization and timely response to requests, this is the absence of debts and proper management of the house in the interests of the owners! With regard to those managing organizations that have two or less stars, we, together with the authorities local government within two months from the date of publication of this rating, we will initiate a general meeting of apartment owners to select a new management organization, from among those who have three stars or more, - said Yulia Belekhova, chairman of the coordinating council of the Association of Chairmen of Councils of Apartment Buildings of the Moscow Region, whose words are quoted in press release.

The services of professional management companies are becoming more and more popular among owners of commercial real estate in our country. This is evidenced by statistics: in Moscow and St. Petersburg since the beginning of 2011, the capacity of the management market has increased by more than 15%, the demand for management services is gradually growing in the regions as well.

It is also very common practice for developers to create internal

MC services are becoming more and more in demand

management companies that intensify competition in the market. Mainly, such companies are created for the purpose of managing financial assets, since the majority of owners in Russia are not yet ready to trust their capital to a third-party management company. In addition, it is assumed that the independent management of the object will allow the owner companies to save a lot of money on the services of the management company. However, in practice, according to experts, it often turns out that the owners do not represent the full scale of work performed by the management company. This leads to numerous errors and financial losses. Therefore, as a result, many owners of objects still turn to professional management companies for help.

The leading management companies manage objects of all segments of commercial real estate

Recognized leaders in the field of commercial real estate management are Russian representative offices of leading foreign companies. Their reputation, authority, experience in managing a large number of facilities and the professionalism of their employees inspire the greatest confidence among the owners. In addition, an attractive factor for clients of such companies is their use of advanced Western management technologies in their work, which provide ease of control and transparency of reporting for owners. Another important plus is that in most cases, these companies provide not only management services, but also consulting and agency assistance.

CBRichardEllis (CBRE- a company that many call the world leader in commercial real estate, is represented on Russian market since 1994. Over the years, the volume of space managed by the company has exceeded 800,000 square meters, and the value of assets managed by CBRE has reached $2.9 billion. CB Richard Ellis, in addition to all types of management (Asset management, Facility management, Propetry management and Building management), provides a range of services in the field of commercial real estate: consulting, agency, appraisal, research and investment. CBRE clients are: large companies like Aeroflot, Yukos, Sberbank, Rosneft, General Motors" and many others.

In alliance with CBRE, it works dynamically on the St. Petersburg market growing company MarisProperties (Maris| CBRE) , which also provides a full range of services for working with commercial real estate, including technical, operational, legal and financial management.

Company NAIbecar- the Russian division of one of the universally recognized world leaders - NAIGlobal. NAI Becar operates in all segments of commercial real estate, on this moment the company manages over 1.1 million sq.m. areas in 20 Russian cities. In addition to consulting and investment services, as well as real estate valuation, NAI Becar's main focus is facility and asset management. Moreover, the company provides a full range of management services - Property management (lease management), Facility management (facility operation), integrated property management (PM and FM together), Asset management (financial assets trust management).

In addition to a range of consulting and brokerage services in the field of commercial real estate, the Russian division of the global company Cushman & Wakefield deals with asset management (Asset management) and construction management (Building management) at any stage life cycle objects. One of the leaders of Building management in Russia is also a group of companies GVA Sawyer operating in our market since 1993.

One of the world's leading consulting companies Colliers International has a subdivision in its subdivision - Colliers International FM specializing in the management and maintenance of office, retail and warehouse properties. The abbreviation "FM" means that the company is engaged in Facility management, i.e. provides a full range of services for the maintenance and operation of the facility.

Management Company Fragra provides Facility and Propetry management services, i.e. her field of activity includes not only the engineering and technical operation of the facility, but also administrative and legal management, in particular, financial, legal document management, optimization commercial efficiency object. Fragra has been known on the Russian market since 1994, during which time more than 500 large companies have become its clients.

HSG Zander is also one of the few companies in the Russian market that deals only with the complex management of commercial real estate. In Russia - since 1997, during this time the company has managed more than 2.5 million sq.m. commercial areas. In particular, HSG Zander, which provides Facility and Propetry management services, manages such large facilities as the Mercury City Tower in Moscow City and the White Square premium business center in the capital.

Year of foundation: 2005

Headquarters: Moscow

Management: Oksana Kuchura (pictured) and Dmitry Klenov

Offices abroad: Cyprus, Luxembourg

Entry threshold:$10 million

UFG Wealth Management calls itself the first independent family office in Russia. It was founded by Oksana Kuchura in 2005 as an independent family wealth management unit within UFG Asset Management. A year later partner Dmitry Klenov, who is responsible for legal practice, joined the company. Now, under her management and in advising, the assets of several dozen clients worth $750 million. In 2014, real estate acquisition and management services were separated into a separate area in the form of funds through which clients invested $250 million in European and Russian real estate. In addition to Kuchura and Klenov The co-owner of the company is Florian Fenner. German manager Fenner became a partner of UFG in 2002 at the invitation of the founders of the brand - Charles Ryan and former finance minister Boris Fedorov, who died in 2008.

Year of foundation: 1991

Headquarters: Moscow

Management: Andrey Zvezdochkin

Offices abroad: Switzerland, Cyprus, Netherlands

Entry threshold:$0.5 million

Aton is one of the oldest Russian investment companies. In 2000, she launched an asset management business, which is now her main line of business. In 2006, the founder and owner of the company, Evgeny Yuryev, sold Aton's institutional business to Unicredit for $424 million, and in 2010 he revived the company under the same name. The direction of work with large private capital has existed since 2009. Target customers— owners of assets up to $20 million — can receive advice on the organization of funds, international taxation and inheritance issues. By 2015, the group's client assets exceeded $2 billion.

3. Oracle Capital Group/Third Rome

Year of foundation: 2002

Headquarters: Luxembourg

Management: Yuri Gantman

Offices abroad: Switzerland, UK, Cyprus, Bahamas

Entry threshold:$1 million

The multi-family office serves clients from Russia and the CIS countries, including through offices in Moscow and Alma-Ata. The company does not disclose its founders, has Russian-Kazakh roots and a European board of directors, which includes seven Englishmen. Among them are the ex-minister in the government of Tony Blair, the former head of KPMG for the CIS and former director alternative investment sector of the London stock exchange. In 2013, the company entered into a strategic alliance with the Russian company Third Rome, buying out a blocking stake from its founder Andrey Movchan and the Alexander Smuzikov fund. Third Rome, created in 2009 by people from Renaissance Investment Management, continues to operate under its own brand.

Year of foundation: 2003

Headquarters: Moscow

Management: Rustam Iseev

Offices abroad: Great Britain

Entry threshold:$1 million

The GHP Group has two key partners: Fleming Family & Partners co-founder Mark Garber and former head of JP Morgan Capital Markets Ian Hannam. They have known each other since the 1990s, when they orchestrated the sale to the Fleming family of the Russian investment bank UCB, owned by Garber and Hans-Jörg Rudloff. In 2012 they bought Russian business FF&P with the Fleming family to work together in wealth management and private equity in emerging markets. GHP Group owns about 20% of the shares of the FESCO transport holding, controlled by the Summa group of Ziyaudin Magomedov.

Year of foundation: 2008

Headquarters: Moscow

Management: Andrey Gaek

Offices abroad: Cyprus

Entry threshold:$1 million

The group of companies was founded by top managers of the investment division of Nomos-Bank together with the ICT group of billionaire Alexander Nesis. Later, Andrey Gayek, who became the controlling shareholder, bought out his share. He calls the group an investment boutique for private and institutional clients. Specializes in brokerage, bond strategies and private equity. It manages $1.2 billion in private client funds. The group's clients are conservative investors, business owners in Russia and abroad, according to the conclusion of the international rating agency Standard & Poor's.

Year of foundation: 2009

Headquarters: Moscow

Management: Andrey Nikityuk

Offices abroad: Switzerland, UK, Italy

Entry threshold: not disclosed

Company founder Vincenzo Trani came to Russia in 2001 to develop small business lending at the EBRD-initiated KMB Bank. He is still supporting small businesses through a small Mikro Capital fund. However, his main business is General Invest. The company provides wealth management, family office and brokerage services on international platforms. Trani is the Honorary Consul of the Republic of Belarus in his native Naples. According to Trani, he is well acquainted with Silvio Berlusconi, but he keeps the circumstances of his acquaintance a secret.

Year of foundation: 2003

Headquarters: Zurich, Switzerland

Management: Sinan Bodmer

Offices abroad: Switzerland, UK, Cyprus, Singapore, New Zealand

Entry threshold: not disclosed

Marcuard Heritage, which manages $3 billion of wealthy clients' assets, has close ties to Russia. Its two founders Sinan Bodmer and Adrian Guldener worked with Russian clients at UBS. The third partner, former head of Credit Suisse First Boston, Hans-Jörg Rudloff, was a pioneer of investment banking in Russia, where he co-founded UCB in the early 1990s. The Financial Times characterizes him as one of the few Western investment bankers trusted by President Vladimir Putin. As chairman of Barclays Capital, the investment banker served as an independent director of Rosneft in 2006-2013. Rudloff is a relative of the Marcuard family, whose ancestor founded the family banking house of the same name in Switzerland as early as 1746.

Year of foundation: 2007

Headquarters: Moscow

Management: Alexey Golubovich

Offices abroad: UK, Latvia

Entry threshold: not disclosed

Arbat Capital emerged from the small family office of Aleksey Golubovich, former boss Investment Department of Menatep Bank and Director for strategic planning and corporate finance of Yukos. In 1997-2007, the company was called "Russian Investors" and since then has retained most of the partners and clients. In 2011, the company abandoned the brokerage business and asset management. Now Arbat Capital is developing investment strategies for high net worth individuals and hedge funds in the markets of Europe, America and developing countries. Assets in consulting exceed $500 million.

Founded: 1995

Headquarters: Moscow

Management: Dmitry Bugaenko, Alexey Gnedovsky

Offices abroad: Cyprus

Entry threshold:$0.1 million

Veles Capital is one of the oldest investment groups in Russia, controlled by Dmitry Bugaenko and Alexey Gnedovsky. The total amount of assets under management is 21 billion rubles. It specializes in brokerage operations, organization of bill programs and direct investments. The Group has invested in the industry of Tatarstan and Ukraine, as well as in rental properties, including shopping mall"Atruim" in Moscow. The direction of private capital management has existed in the company since 2006. His key clients with assets ranging from $500,000 to $20 million, the company offers a mix of brokerage, asset management and additional services from legal and tax advice, as well as trust and fiduciary services.

Year of foundation: 2009

Headquarters: Zurich, Switzerland

Management: Josef Meyer

Offices abroad: Switzerland

Entry threshold: not disclosed

In the Swiss Axioma Wealth Management, the only Swiss founder is Josef Meyer, whose activities are mainly related to Russia. In the mid-1990s, his company began by advising regional enterprises on export finance, at the same time private clients began to trust him with asset management. In 2008, he began working in the Swiss "daughter" of the management company "Alliance Continental" Elena Baturina. Later, he bought this company together with his partner Igor Vasiliev from Alfa-Bank, who headed the direction of operations in the money markets there. Based on it, Axioma has grown, which manages private capital on total amount up to $500 million and provides family office services to clients.

21.09.2017 at 21:53 · pavlofox · 620

Rating of management companies in the Moscow region for 2019

The rating of management companies 2019 (Moscow Region) includes management companies that received the title of the best according to the head of the State Housing Inspection Vadim Sokov. The organizations below show top scores in their field of activity for the current year. Also in the first half of the year, a list of the worst housing managers was compiled, who still have time to change their status.

10.

LLC (Korolev) opens the rating of the best company managers in the Moscow region for 2019. The organization is engaged in the maintenance of buildings with a total area of ​​​​more than two million square meters. The housing maintenance company provides a huge range of services, including housing management, acceptance of buildings for operation, landscaping of areas adjacent to residential buildings and their landscaping, construction of small architectural structures with further maintenance, maintenance of intercoms and much more. In resolving all the issues described, Techcomservice-Korolev has proven itself only with better side.

9.

MUP (Serpukhov) belongs to the unitary municipal enterprises, which entered the top ten in the Moscow region. The management company is engaged in the maintenance of the household, current and major repairs of serviced houses. Also within the competence of the Criminal Code is the improvement of the area around residential premises. Zhilischnik also provides additional paid services. but the main activity of this organization is still aimed at managing the operation of the housing stock. "Zhilischnik" has modern equipment and highly qualified specialists, thanks to which the work performed by the enterprise is carried out on time and with high quality.

8.

LLC (Balashikha) is on the eighth line of the rating of the best management companies in the Moscow region for 2019. The management company was founded in 2006, and over more than a ten-year period of work has managed to prove itself only from the best side. "Arch-Stroy Soyuz" first of all takes care of creating comfortable living conditions for residents of the city of Balashikha. She is engaged in the operation and repair of residential premises, which are included in the list of serviced by this management company. The competence of the enterprise includes the adjustment of the engineering equipment of residential premises, their preparation for seasonal operation, as well as carrying out work on sanitary maintenance. adjoining territories and much more. To your work managing organization comes with full responsibility.

7.

MUP (Lytkarino) is the largest management company in the city of Lytkarino, Moscow Region. The main activities of the organization are the maintenance of housing stock, as well as their repair and operation. "DEZ-Lytkarino" is engaged in maintenance of more than two hundred residential multi-storey buildings with with total area more than half a million square meters. The company has all the resources that are needed for high-quality maintenance of residential premises. The housing management company employs only professionals in their field, which allows us to solve the problems that have arisen efficiently and promptly.

6.

LLC (Istra) is included in the rating of the best managing organizations in the Moscow region for the current year. The company is engaged in the maintenance of apartment buildings and their repair. The management enterprise has modern equipment, with the help of which all work is carried out to improve the residents in the houses that Obushkovskoye REP Housing and Public Utilities serves. The competence of this organization also includes the preparation of residential buildings for seasonal operation.

5.

LLC (Zhukovsky) is one of the best management companies located in the Moscow region. The company was founded in 1991. Behind long years work "Eureka" managed to earn good reputation. The organization is engaged in the construction of multi-storey residential complexes and their commissioning. The competence of the management company includes maintenance of the erected housing stock, their preparation for seasonal operation, current and overhaul. Evrika has modern, innovative equipment and highly qualified specialists, thanks to which all work is carried out efficiently and on time.

4.

LLC (Yegoryevsk) is rightfully included in the top ten management organizations in the Moscow region. The organization offers a variety of services, including the operation, as well as the repair of serviced housing stock. The company specializes in housing and communal services. It is engaged in heat, water, and energy supply of residential premises. the competence of the enterprise also includes an examination of the condition of building elements with the issuance of a technical opinion and much more.

3.

”, LLC (Dubna) opens the top three management organizations in the Moscow region. The company is working on maintenance residential premises, and also conducts engineering diagnostics of structures and drainage ways. The company also performs diagnostics in other areas - roofs, traction substations, automated control systems, silt pipelines. Also within the competence of "UCS" is the improvement of adjacent territories.

2.

LLC (Dzerzhinsky) is on the second line among the best management companies in the Moscow region. The company is engaged in maintenance of residential multi-storey buildings and offers a wide range of services. The competence of the enterprise includes the repair of houses and the improvement of adjacent territories, as well as transport services. In addition, the Management Company carries out the removal of household and bulky waste using its own transport. Also, "HSTF FOBOS" carries out the conclusion of contracts for heat, water and energy supply and much more.

1.

LLC (Bronnitsy) is on the first line of the rating of the best management companies in the Moscow region for this year. The organization provides services in many areas, the main of which are the construction of residential and administrative buildings, sanitary work in the adjacent territories to housing stock, finishing and repair work, electrical installation work, collection and processing Wastewater, preparation of residential premises for seasonal operation, as well as waterproofing works. In 2017, the management company showed the best performance among other similar organizations in the region.

What else to see: