EGE assessment scale in the Russian language. EGE assessment criteria

In the Unified State Examination in the Russian language 2017, 25 tasks are evaluated, of which 24 are tests, and 25 are an essay on the text. Today, in test tasks, it is necessary either to write down the words correctly (and not just find them), or to find two correct answers from the proposed ones (tasks 1 and 15), or to name the numbers indicating the correct setting of commas. Task 7 remains difficult, where you need to correlate erroneous sentences with the rules according to which errors were made.

1 point for a correct answer, 0 points for an incorrect one	0 to 2 points	0 to 4 points	0 to 5 points
For the correct completion of tasks 2–6, 8–14, 16–23, the examinee gets 1 point. For an incorrect answer or its absence, a 0 points.	For completing tasks 1 and 15, from 0 to 2 points can be set. The answer is considered correct if it has all the numbers from the standard and is missing other numbers. 1 point is given if: one of the numbers indicated in the answer, does not meet the standard; one of the numbers specified in the standard is missing response. In all other cases, 0 points are given.	Task 24 can be assigned from 0 to 4 points. Faithful	Task 7 can be assigned from 0 to 5 points. Faithful the answer is considered in which there are all the numbers from the standard and there are no others numbers. For each correctly indicated digit corresponding to the number from list, the examinee receives 1 point.
Maximum Points
Minimum Points

Criteria for evaluating an essay

		Points
	Statement of source text problems
	The examinee (in one form or another) correctly formulated one of the problems of the original text. There are no factual errors related to the understanding and formulation of the problem.
	The examinee could not correctly formulate any of the problems of the source text.
	Commentary on the formulated problem of the original text
	The problem formulated by the examiner is commented. There are no factual errors related to understanding the source text in the comments.
	The problem formulated by the examinee is commented, no more than 1 factual error was made in the comments related to the understanding of the source text.
	The problem formulated by the examinee is not commented, more than 1 factual error was made in the comments related to the understanding of the source text, commented on another problem not formulated by the examiner, a simple retelling of the text or its fragment is given as a comment, a large fragment of the original text is cited as comments.
	The examinee correctly formulated the position of the author (narrator) of the source text on the commented problem. There are no actual errors related to understanding the position of the author of the source text.
	Argumentation by the examinees of their own opinion on the problem
	The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (given at least 2 arguments, one of which was taken from fiction, journalistic or scientific literature).
	The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (given at least 2 arguments, based on knowledge or life experience), conducted only 1 argument from fiction, journalistic or scientific literature.
	The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (given 1 argument), based on knowledge, life or reading experience.
	The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), but did not give arguments, OR the examinee's opinion is only formally stated (for example: "I agree / disagree with the author"), not reflected in the work at all.
	SPEECH DESIGN OF AN ESSAY
	Semantic integrity, speech coherence and sequence of presentation
	The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, speech coherence and sequence of presentation: There are no logical errors, the sequence of presentation is not broken; There are no violations of paragraph articulation of the text in the work.
	The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, coherence and consistency of presentation, 1 logical error was made, there is 1 violation of paragraph articulation of the text in the work.
	In the work of the examinee, a communicative intent is visible, more than 1 logical error was made, There are 2 cases of violation of paragraph articulation of the text.
	Accuracy and expressiveness of speech
	The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of the expression of thought, the variety of the grammatical structure of speech.
	The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of the expression of thought, the monotony of the grammatical structure of speech is traced, the work of the examinee is characterized by a variety of grammatical structure of speech, there are violations of the accuracy of the expression of thought.
	The work of the examinee is distinguished by the poverty of the dictionary and the monotony of the grammatical structure of speech.
	LITERACY
	Compliance with spelling rules
	no spelling errors (or 1 minor error)
	1-2 mistakes made
	more than 2-3 mistakes made
	more than 3 errors	0
	Compliance punctuation norms
	no punctuation errors (or 1 minor error)
	made 1-2 mistakes
	made 2-3 mistakes
	more than 3 errors	0
	Language Compliance
	no grammatical errors
	made 1-2 mistakes
	more than 2 errors
	Compliance with speech norms
	no more than 1 speech error
	made 2-3 mistakes
	more than 3 errors
	Compliance ethical standards
	there are no ethical errors in the work
	ethical mistakes made (1 or more)
	Maintain factual accuracy in background material
	there are no factual errors in the background material
	factual errors (1 or more) in the background material
	Maximum score per essay

When assessing literacy (K7-K10), the volume of the essay should be taken into account. The assessment standards indicated in the table are designed for an essay of 150-300 words. If the essay contains less than 70 words, then such work is not counted and 0 points are scored, the task is considered failed.

When counting words, both independent and auxiliary parts of speech are taken into account. Any sequence of words written without a space is counted (for example, "after all" - one word, "yet" - two words). Initials with a surname are considered one word (for example, "M.Yu. Lermontov" - one word). Any other characters, in particular numbers, are not taken into account when calculating (for example, "5 years" - one word, "five years" - two words).
If the essay contains a partially or completely rewritten text of the review of task 24 and / or information about the author of the text by the examinee, then the volume of such work is determined without taking into account the text of the review and / or information about the author of the text.

When evaluating an essay with a volume of 70 to 150 words, the number of permissible errors of four types (K7–K10) decreases.

2 points for these criteria are given in the following cases:
K7 - there are no spelling errors (or one minor mistake was made);
K8 - there are no punctuation errors (or one minor mistake was made).

1 point for these criteria is given in the following cases:
K7 - no more than two errors were made;
K8 - one or three mistakes were made;
K9 - no grammatical errors;
K10 - no more than one speech error was made.

The highest score according to the K7–K12 criteria is not given for a work of 70 to 150 words.

If the essay is a paraphrase or a completely rewritten source text without any comments, then such work for all aspects of the test (K1-K12) is estimated at 0 points. If the work, which is a rewritten or paraphrased source text, contains fragments of the text of the examinee, then only the number of words that belongs to the examinee is taken into account during the check. A work written without relying on the text read (not on this text) is not evaluated.

In accordance with the Procedure for conducting the state final certification for educational programs middle general education(Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia dated December 26, 2013 No. 1400 was registered by the Ministry of Justice of Russia on February 3, 2014 No. 31205) “61. According to the results of the first and second checks, the experts independently assign points for each answer to the tasks examination work Unified State Examination with a detailed answer ... 62. In case of a significant discrepancy in the scores given by two experts, a third test is assigned. A significant discrepancy in points is determined in the evaluation criteria for the corresponding subject. The expert who carries out the third check is provided with information about the scores given by the experts who previously checked the examination paper.
A significant discrepancy is considered to be a discrepancy of 8 or more primary points between the sums of points given by the first and second experts for completing task 25 (for all 12 assessment positions). In this case, the third expert must give points only for those assessment items for which the points given by the first and second experts differ.

At the end of May, 11th grade graduates will face a rather difficult test - USE in Russian language 2017. This exam is considered mandatory, the same as mathematics, so everyone will have to take it without exception. To date, the main task for eleventh graders is timely preparation for the test so that the certificate is not spoiled by a bad grade. In addition, a high score for the Unified State Examination in the Russian language opens the door to the most prestigious universities in the country for the future applicant.

Most students, assuming that tests in Russian are not as difficult as mathematics or physics, are not prepared for the subject at all and, as a result, do not receive high enough scores. It must be remembered that the exam covers not only materials for grade 11, but also topics from previous years of study. In addition, the exam includes such tasks that require extraordinary thinking. As you can see, the Russian language is not such an easy subject, and given the future, predicted for 2017, it will become even more difficult.

What should be prepared for?

The fact that tests in the Russian language are waiting for a number of innovations has been said more than once. For for long years scientists and educators have developed optimal system knowledge test that could reflect the real knowledge of students. In 2017, it is planned to introduce an oral part in the Unified State Examination in the Russian language. This has already been stated by Lyudmila Verbitskaya (head Russian Academy education).

On this stage all the necessary transformations have already been developed. It remains only to understand how to rationally use them in this.

Until 2017 all students general education schools handed over the Russian language in writing. The test form that was in the forms is, of course, a good thing, but it is not able to reflect the real knowledge of graduates, because they can simply guess the answer. But what about punctuation or spelling? Tests are not able to thoroughly show the literacy of the student.

The oral exam will help to identify gaps in knowledge, the ability to accurately express one's thoughts, put sentences out of words and lead a narrative that is understandable to examiners.

In our time, the correct staging of speech is extremely important, especially in sectors of the economy. Any leader should be able to formulate tasks for subordinates, be able to express thoughts and convey their ideas to others. Just for this, every student must learn spelling, as well as learn the basics of oratory.

The oral block is far from all the changes that await the Russian language exam. In the upcoming 2017, officials intend to introduce a grading system for a control essay. Recall that at the moment for the manifestation creativity and the ability to logically build their own thoughts, the student received simply “pass” or “fail”.

Lyudmila Verbitskaya considers this an unfair approach, especially for those students who can show the level of their knowledge through an essay. Only the introduction of a clear assessment scale will help to clearly recognize the level of preparedness of the student and form a clear objective view of the exam.

Dates

Early exams will begin on May 25, 2017. Just during this period, eleventh-graders will be able to pass the Russian language. The main tests are scheduled for May 30. Retake for those who “flunked” the subject or want to increase their grade, there will be an opportunity to take the second exam on June 27th. The reserve days are April 15 and September 24.

Conducting the exam in the Russian language

To cope with all the tasks, students are given an hour. In the allotted time, it is necessary to solve all two blocks, which include 24 questions. The first block consists of questions that must be answered numerically or verbally. On the second form, students must write an essay on a given topic.

Evaluation scale

Back in 2015, for this test, you could get a “pass / fail”. Since 2016, points have appeared, the amount of which depended on the number of correct answers. From the table below, you can find out the exact number of points that you can get for a particular question.

The second part of the exam requires the student to show creativity and fluency in Russian. Note that essays are evaluated in a special way, so the examiner will not be surprised by grammar alone.

For a correctly completed second part of the exam, the student can earn 25 points. In general, for two blocks, the graduate will earn 57 points, to which points are added according to other criteria. Considering that the knowledge assessment system is 100 points, in order to understand what grade a student has earned, it is enough to refer to this scheme:

• 0 - 24 - "two"
• 25 - 57 - "troika"
• 58 - 71 - "four"
• from 72 - “five”

Note that the minimum number of points for admission to a university is only 36 points, but to obtain a certificate it is enough to score 24 points.

Materials for preparing for the exam in the Russian language

Now a lot of literature is published annually, which helps future graduates prepare for the exam. In addition, a lot of additional materials are provided for general access on the FIPI official website, namely:

1. Demo version of the exam
2. Task forms
3. Training compilations
4. Video consultations

Among the most optimal literature for preparation, it is worth highlighting the manual from the author Tsybulko I.P.

JUDGING CRITERIA

EXAM IN RUSSIAN LANGUAGE IN 11 CLASS (USE)

For the right execution all assignments examination work can be obtained as much as possible 55 primary points.

For the right execution everyone tasks parts 1 (except tasks 7, 15 and 24) the graduate receives 1 point. For an incorrect answer or its absence, 0 points are set.

For fulfillment tasks 7 can be exhibited from 0 to 5 points. For each correctly indicated digit corresponding to the number from the list, the examinee receives 1 point (5 points: no errors; 4 points: 1 mistake made; 3 points: 2 mistakes made; 2 points: 2 digits are correctly indicated; 1 point: only one digit is correctly indicated; 0 points: a completely wrong answer, i.e. an incorrect sequence of numbers or its absence). The order in which the numbers are written in the answer matters.

For fulfillment tasks 15 can be exhibited from 0 to 2 points. For each correctly indicated digit corresponding to the number of the answer, the examiner receives 1 point. If 2 numbers are correct, the examiner gets 2 points.

For fulfillment tasks 24 can be exhibited from 0 to 4 points. For each correctly indicated digit corresponding to the number of the term from the list, the examinee receives 1 point (4 points: no errors; 3 points: 1 mistake was made; 2 points: 2 mistakes were made; 1 point: only one digit is correctly indicated; 0 points: a completely wrong answer, i.e. an incorrect sequence of numbers or its absence. The order of writing the numbers in the answer matters.

Maximum Points, which can be obtained by a student who correctly completed the task part 2, is 23 points.

Criteria for evaluating a task with a detailed answer (essay)

Criteria for evaluating the answer to task C1

Points

I

Essay content

K1

Statement of source text problems

The examinee (in one form or another in any part of the essay) correctly formulated one of the problems of the original text.


There are no factual errors related to the understanding and formulation of the problem.

1

The examinee could not correctly formulate any of the problems of the source text.

0

K2

Commentary on the formulated problem of the original text

The problem formulated by the examinee is commented on based on the source text. Factual errors related to understanding the problem of the source text,
 no comments

2

The problem formulated by the examinee is not commented,or more than 1 factual error related to the understanding of the source text was made in the comments, or commented on another problem not formulated by the examiner,or a simple retelling of the text or its fragment is given as comments,
 or a large piece of source text is cited as comments

0

K3

The examinee correctly formulated the position of the author (narrator) of the source text on the commented problem.
There are no factual errors related to understanding the position of the author of the source text.

1

0

K4

Argumentation by the examinees of their own opinion on the problem

The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (given at least 2 arguments, one of which was taken from fiction, journalistic or scientific literature)

3

The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (given at least 2 arguments, based on knowledge, life experience), or cited only 1 argument from fiction, journalistic or scientific literature

2

The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (given 1 argument), based on knowledge, life experience

1

The examinee formulated his opinion on the problem posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), but did not give arguments, or the opinion of the examinee is stated only formally (for example: “I agree / disagree with the author”), or the opinion of the examinee is not reflected at all in the work

0

II

Speech design of the essay

K5

Semantic integrity, speech coherence and sequence of presentation

The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, speech coherence and sequence of presentation:
- there are no logical errors, the sequence of presentation is not violated;
– there are no violations of paragraph articulation in the text

2

The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, coherence and consistency of presentation, But 1 logical error was made, and/or there is 1 violation of paragraph division of the text in the work

1

In the work of the examinee, a communicative intent is visible,
 but more than 1 logical error was made,
 and/or there are 2 cases of violation of paragraph articulation of the text

0

K6

Accuracy and expressiveness of speech

The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of the expression of thought, the variety of the grammatical structure of speech.
*The highest score for this criterion is received by the examinee only if the highest score is obtained according to the criterion K10

2

The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of the expression of thought, But the monotony of the grammatical structure of speech is traced, or the work of the examinee is characterized by a variety of grammatical structure of speech, But there are violations of the accuracy of the expression of thought

1

The work of the examinee is distinguished by the poverty of the dictionary and the monotony of the grammatical structure of speech.

0

III

Literacy

K7

Compliance with spelling rules

no spelling errors (or 1 minor error)

3

no more than 2 errors were made

2

3-4 mistakes made

1

more than 4 mistakes made

0

K8

Compliance with punctuation rules

no punctuation errors (or 1 minor error)

3

1-3 mistakes made

2

4–5 errors were made

1

more than 5 mistakes made

0

K9

Language Compliance

no grammatical errors

2

1-2 mistakes made

1

more than 2 mistakes made

0

K10

Compliance with speech norms

no more than 1 speech error

2

2-3 mistakes made

1

more than 3 mistakes made

0

K11

Ethical Compliance

there are no ethical errors in the work

1

ethical mistakes made (1 or more)

0

K12.

Maintain factual accuracy in background material

there are no factual errors in the background material

1

factual errors (1 or more) in the background material

0

Maximum points for the entire written work (K1-K12)

When assessing literacy (K7-K10), the volume of the essay should be taken into account. The assessment standards indicated in the table are designed for an essay of 150-300 words.

If the essay has less than 70 words, then such work is not counted and is evaluated with zero points, the task is considered failed.

When evaluating an essay by volume 70 to 150 words number of allowed errors four types (K7–K10) decreases.

2 points for these criteria are given in the following cases:

K7 - there are no spelling errors (or 1 minor mistake was made);

K8 - no punctuation errors (or 1 minor error).

1 point for these criteria is given in the following cases:

K7 - no more than 2 errors were made;

K8 - 1-3 mistakes were made;

K9 - no grammatical errors;

K10 - no more than 1 speech error was made.

Highest mark according to the criteria K7–K12 for volume work 70 to 150 words Not put.

If the essay is a paraphrase or a completely rewritten source text without any comments, then such work for all aspects of the test (K1-K12) is evaluated by zero points.

If the work, which is a rewritten or paraphrased source text, contains fragments of the text of the examinee, then only the number of words that belongs to the examinee is taken into account during the check. A work written without relying on the text read (not on this text) is not evaluated.

GOOD LUCK TO YOU,

GRADUATES!

Next year, the Russian government decided to make changes to the state compulsory USE exam. It is planned to introduce the oral part of the Unified State Examination in the Russian language 2017. There are already algorithms for the oral part. As with surrender foreign languages V oral, the student listens to the task for twenty minutes and answers five questions, describing the picture and asking questions. Next, the inspectors listen to the student's recording and give a grade. This model of conducting the oral part of the Unified State Examination in the Russian language suits the experts. The only thing that is required from the government of the country is to quickly and efficiently equip the premises for passing this type of exam. Because, unlike foreign languages, Russian is taken by about 700 thousand applicants annually. The only aesthetic inconvenience is the passing of an oral exam for children with speech defects, but now this is under consideration by teachers to improve the delivery system in general.

Document punctuation has been preserved.

№	Criteria for evaluating the answer to task C1	Points
I
K1	Statement of source text problems
	The examinee (in one form or another in any part of the essay) correctly formulated one of the problems of the original text. There are no factual errors related to the understanding and formulation of the problem.	1
	The examinee could not correctly formulate any of the problems of the source text.	0
K2	Commentary on the formulated problem of the original text
	The problem formulated by the examinee is commented on based on the source text. The examinee gave at least 2 examples from the read text that are important for understanding the problem.	3
	The problem formulated by the examinee is commented on based on the source text. The examinee gave 1 example from the read text, which is important for understanding the problem. There are no factual errors related to understanding the problem of the original text in the comment	2
	The problem of the text formulated by the examiner is commented on based on the source text, But the examinee did not give a single example from the read text that is important for understanding the problem, or one factual error was made in the comment related to understanding the problem of the original text	1
	The problem formulated by the examiner is not commented or commented without relying on the original text, or there is more than one factual error in the comment related to the understanding of the original text, or commented another, not formulated or instead of a comment, a simple retelling of the text or its fragment is given, or instead of a comment, a large fragment of the source text is quoted	0
K3	Reflection of the position of the author of the original text
	The examinee correctly formulated the position of the author (narrator) of the source text on the commented problem. There are no factual errors related to understanding the position of the author of the source text.	1
	The position of the author of the original text by the examinee is formulated incorrectly, or the position of the author of the original text is not formulated	0
K4	Argumentation by the examinees of their own opinion on the problem
	The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (given at least 2 arguments, one of which was taken from fiction, journalistic or scientific literature)	3
	The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (given at least 2 arguments, based on knowledge, life experience), or cited only 1 argument from fiction, journalistic or scientific literature	2
	The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (given 1 argument), based on knowledge, life experience	1
	The examinee formulated his opinion on the problem posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), but did not give arguments, or the opinion of the examinee is stated only formally (for example: “I agree / disagree with the author”), or the opinion of the examinee is not reflected at all in the work	0
II	Speech design of the essay
K5	Semantic integrity, speech coherence and sequence of presentation
	The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, speech coherence and sequence of presentation: - there are no logical errors, the sequence of presentation is not violated; - there are no violations of paragraph articulation of the text in the work	2
	The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, coherence and consistency of presentation, But one logical error and/or there is one violation of paragraph articulation of the text in the work	1
	In the work of the examinee, a communicative intent is visible, But more than one logical error was made, and/or there are two cases of violation of paragraph articulation of the text	0
K6	Accuracy and expressiveness of speech
	The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of the expression of thought, the variety of the grammatical structure of speech. *The highest score for this criterion is received by the examinee only if the highest score is obtained according to the criterion K10	2
	The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of the expression of thought, But the monotony of the grammatical structure of speech is traced, or the work of the examinee is characterized by a variety of grammatical structure of speech, But there are violations of the accuracy of the expression of thought	1
	The work of the examinee is distinguished by the poverty of the dictionary and the monotony of the grammatical structure of speech.	0
III	Literacy
K7	Compliance with spelling rules
	no spelling errors (or 1 minor error)	3
	no more than 2 errors were made	2
	made 3-4 mistakes	1
	more than 4 mistakes made	0
K8	Compliance with punctuation rules
	no punctuation errors (or 1 minor error)	3
	1-3 mistakes made	2
	4-5 mistakes made	1
	more than 5 mistakes made	0
K9	Language Compliance
	no grammatical errors	2
	1-2 mistakes made	1
	more than 2 mistakes made	0
K10	Compliance with speech norms
	no more than 1 speech error	2
	made 2-3 mistakes	1
	more than 3 mistakes made	0
K11	Ethical Compliance
	there are no ethical errors in the work	1
	ethical mistakes made (1 or more)	0
K12.	Maintain factual accuracy in background material
	there are no factual errors in the background material	1
	factual errors (1 or more) in the background material	0
	The maximum number of points for the entire written work (K1-K12)	24

When assessing literacy (K7-K10), the volume of the essay 1 should be taken into account.

1. The assessment standards indicated in the table are designed for an essay of 150-300 words 2 .

2. If the essay contains less than 70 words, then such work is not counted and 0 points are assessed, the task is considered failed.

When evaluating an essay with a volume of 70 to 150 words, the number of permissible errors of four types (K7-K10) decreases.

2 points for these criteria are given in the following cases:
K7 - there are no spelling errors (or one minor mistake was made);
K8 - there are no punctuation errors (or one minor mistake was made). 1 point according to these criteria is given in the following cases:
K7 - no more than two errors were made;
K8 - one - three mistakes were made;
K9 - no grammatical errors;
K10 - no more than one speech error was made.

The highest score according to the K7-K12 criteria for a work of 70 to 150 words is not set.

If the essay is a paraphrase or a completely rewritten source text without any comments, then such work for all aspects of the test (K1-K12) is estimated at 0 points.

If a work that is a rewritten or paraphrased source text contains fragments of text
examiner, then the test takes into account only the number of words that belong to the examinee.

A work written without relying on the text read (not on this text) is not evaluated.

1 When counting words, both independent and auxiliary parts of speech are taken into account.
Any sequence of words written without a space is counted (for example, "after all" - one word, "yet" - two words). Initials with a surname are considered one word (for example, "M.Yu. Lermontov" - one word). Any other characters, in particular numbers, are not taken into account when calculating (for example, "5 years" - one word, "five years" - two
words).
2 If the essay contains a partially or completely rewritten text of the review of task 24 and / or information about the author of the text by the examinee, then the volume of such work is determined without taking into account the text of the review and / or information about the author of the text.

In accordance with the Procedure for conducting state final certification for educational programs of secondary general education (order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia dated December 26, 2013 No. 1400 was registered by the Ministry of Justice of Russia on February 03, 2014 No. 31205)
“61. Based on the results of the first and second checks, experts independently assign points for each answer to the tasks of the USE examination paper with a detailed answer ...
62. In the event of a significant discrepancy in the scores given by two experts, a third test is scheduled. A significant discrepancy in scores is determined in the assessment criteria for the corresponding academic subject.
The expert who carries out the third check is provided with information about the scores given by the experts who previously checked the examination paper.